Insights | Article

The Reactive Trap: Branding in Zimbabwe

Why brands fall behind, and what strategy-first brand identity can change


By John Murinye

Starlink Logo — The Reactive Trap: Branding in Zimbabwe

Starlink Logo — The Reactive Trap: Branding in Zimbabwe

When Starlink entered Zimbabwe, it didn’t just bring satellite internet. It brought a mindset shift.

The launch shook the telecoms industry, forcing competitors to re-evaluate their positioning and promises. But Starlink’s biggest disruption wasn’t technology — it was leadership.

By maintaining a singular, global promise of high-speed internet anywhere and pairing it with a radically simple, tech-first brand identity, Starlink set new expectations before its service was even fully available.

We’ve seen this mindset before. In the late 1990s, Econet Wireless challenged the state monopoly, PTC, and redefined what was possible in Zimbabwean telecoms. That fight wasn’t won by having the most resources — it was won by having the clearest vision.

The same principle applies to branding in Zimbabwe today. Many brands have the potential to lead, yet operate reactively, adjusting only when competition or market shifts force their hand. True brand leadership is proactive — and it’s a mindset long before it’s a marketing campaign.


Why Do Brands in Zimbabwe React Instead of Lead?

Reactivity isn’t always laziness — often it’s a survival response. Zimbabwean businesses operate in a volatile economy with shifting regulations, currency instability, and supply chain disruptions. This environment can push leaders into short-term thinking, focusing only on immediate wins.

Other factors compound the problem:

  • Lack of strategic marketing expertise to define a clear long-term brand position.
  • Short-term investor or owner pressure that prioritises quick returns over brand-building.
  • Comfort in current profits that dulls the urgency to innovate until a competitor forces change.

While these are real challenges, history shows they’re not unbreakable cycles.


The Reactive Branding Trap

Too many businesses in Zimbabwe default to “just enough.” As long as profits remain steady, innovation gets delayed.

In branding, this reactive posture leads to short-term fixes rather than long-term leadership. From a brand identity perspective, the results are predictable:

  • Definition – Without a clear strategic anchor, a brand’s message shifts with the winds, leaving its identity fragile.
  • Differentiation – Copying competitors makes it harder to stand out, ensuring you blend into the very market you want to lead.
  • Cohesion – Without a unified system, campaigns, visuals, and experiences feel disconnected from each other.

The result? A logo design refresh here, a campaign tweak there — but no overarching direction.

And this isn’t limited to telecoms. The same pattern plays out in fintech, agriculture, mining, retail, and other sectors — industries that could lead markets regionally, yet often wait for external disruption before evolving.


A Homegrown Lesson in Brand Leadership: Econet vs PTC

In the late 1990s, the Posts and Telecommunications Corporation (PTC) had every advantage a monopoly could want:

  • Massive infrastructure built over decades.
  • Government backing with regulatory and financial support.
  • Established revenue streams from exclusive control over all telecom services.
  • Incumbent advantage with nationwide facilities and a large customer base.

By contrast, Econet Wireless Zimbabwe was a complete newcomer:

  • Zero infrastructure and no customer base.
  • Severe funding challenges compounded by a five-year legal battle to secure a licence.
  • Hostile political and regulatory environment actively resisting competition.
  • High startup risk with no operational history in the sector.

And yet, Econet pressed forward — building its network from scratch and launching as a credible competitor.

The lesson: the economy doesn’t need to be perfect for you to invest in your brand and lead your market. Leadership often emerges from constraint, not comfort.

Leadership is a Mindset, Not a Budget

When Econet challenged PTC, it didn’t have the largest resources. When Starlink entered Zimbabwe, it faced a volatile market and still found a way to deliver.

The common thread is intent. Both acted with a long-term vision and were willing to commit to it. This is where many brands fall short — treating identity as decoration instead of direction.


How We Approach Branding in Zimbabwe at Zarura

If your brand is unclear, inconsistent, or generic, the Zarura Brand Operating System (BOS) is our proven framework for building scalable brands.

It combines strategy, messaging, visuals, sound, and film into one cohesive system that:

  • Cuts through the noise.
  • Aligns every customer touchpoint.
  • Embeds brand values into operational decision-making.

As a strategy-first brand identity agency, we design BOS so that every decision — strategic, verbal, visual, sonic or motion — aligns with a clearly defined direction.

When your brand identity is built to lead, logo design isn’t just an aesthetic upgrade. It’s a deliberate step in shaping perception, building trust, and influencing the market before competitors react.

The Challenge to Zimbabwean Brands

Zimbabwe has no shortage of creativity or talent. What it needs is the discipline to channel those strengths into brands that lead.

The stories of Econet and Starlink prove that leadership is a choice — one that can be made regardless of market conditions.

The question: will your brand wait for the next disruption, or will it become the disruption?

Don’t Sell Emotions.

Sell Emotions, Not Products. This is a drastically flawed philosophy — that will, in the…

What really is a logo identity?

Think of a flag of a country — a very reductive graphic element, that represents so much…

Proven Impact of Good Design

In Zimbabwe’s competitive market, good design is proven to have impact on brand identity…